Петрусевич Н. Предварительный отчёт об исследовании Дарьялыка (Узбоя) и местности между Аму-Дарьёю Сары-Камышем; Краткие сведения о туркменском населении между старым руслом Аму-Дарьи (Узбоем) и северными окраинами Персии / Известия Кавказского (2025)

Петрусевич Н. Туркмены между старым руслом Аму-Дарьи (Узбоем) и северными окраинами Персии / Записки Кавказского отдела Императорского Русского географического общества. Кн.XI, вып.1. Тифлис, 1880

Аваков П.А. Армяне на Дону в XVII–XVIII вв. (до 1779 г.) // Армяне Юга России: история, культура, общее будущее: Материалы Всероссийской научной конференции: (30 мая–2 июня 2012 г., Ростов-на-Дону). Ростов н/Д., 2012. С. 120-125.

The Armenians in the Don Region in the 17–18th centuries (until 1779)

Ярхо А.И. Туркмены Хорезма и Северного Кавказа (Антропологический очерк о длинноголовом европеоидном компоненте турецких народностей СССР) / Антропологический журнал. 1933, №1-2

Пыслару И. Феномен евразийских степей в раннем железном веке и о киммерийцах в Карпатско-Дунайском регионе // Сакская культура Сарыарки в контексте изучения этносоциокультурных процессов Cтепной Евразии. – Алматы, 2015. – С. 132-145.

Pyslaru I. A phenomenon of the Eurasian steppes from in the early iron age and about cimmeriens in the Karpato-Danube region // Sak culture of Saryarka in the context of the study of ethnic and sociocultural processes of Steppe Eurasia. The collection of scientific articles, dedicated to the memory archaeologist Kemal Akishev. – Алматы: HARC “Begazy-Тasmola”, 2015. – Р. 132-145. In the west and north area of the Black Sea, at the end of the Bronze Age-beginning of the Iron Age, had taken place some important historical changes that marked the start of 1 st millennium B.C. Then, on the ancient history arena, appeared the Cimmerians and Scythians, nomadic peoples. The problem of the Cimmerians presence in the Carpathian-Danubian space was already approached in numerous papers of researchers from different countries, but being far from clarified. Here we will identify some characteristic particulates of the Cimmerian culture which we found in the Carpathian-Danubian area. The “Cimmerian” culture it’s represented by a group of funerary discoveries, collections of harness parts and weapons without a context and a few “deposits”, like the anthropomorphic stone stars. These, mostly, aren’t taken by researchers in considerations when analyzing the Cimmerian problem. The author reached the conclusion that the “dear stones” statuettes mark the territory occupied by the “pre-Scythian”/Cimmerian population. Accepting this idea, the existence of a big “Cimmerian-Scythian” historic-cultural community, we will be able to define a first chronological period linked by the Cimmerians and a second one by Scythians. Пыслару И. Феномен евразийских степей в раннем железном веке и о киммерийцах в Карпатско-Дунайском регионе // Сакская культура Сарыарки в контексте изучения этносоциокультурных процессов Cтепной Евразии. Сборник научных статей, посвященный памяти археолога К. А. Акишева. – Алматы: НИЦИА «Бегазы-Тасмола», 2015. – С. 132-145.

Гельман. Обводнение старого русла р. Аму-Дарьи / Известия Туркестанского отдела Императорского Русского географического общества. Т.II, вып.I. Ташкент, 1900

Верещагин. Река Аму-Дарья между г.г. Керки и Келифом в пределах Бухары и прибрежные пути / Сборник географических, топографических и статистических материалов по Азии. Вып.LVII. СПб, 1894

Гуцу Марина, Думиника Иван. Списки задунайских переселенцев колоний Комрат и Тараклия 1818 г. как источник демографических процессов в Буджаке // Buletin Ştiinţific al Tinerilor Istorici. Vol. I (VI). Chişinău, 2012. С. 301-309.

In this article, authors analyzed the information given in the"Lists of the trans-Danubian immigrants, who have settled in Bessarabia". These lists were made up in 1818, as a result of work of the Commission scheduled by Dmitry Vatichioti, and guardian supervisor of Bessarabian Bulgarians, General Ivan Inzov. The aim of the commission was to set the exact number of Bulgarian immigrants settled on the private estates and state lands. Thereafter, under the prescriptions of these documents, and with the support of I. N. Inzov, trans Danubian settlers, have obtained certain rights and privileges. Studying this list, researchers aim to present two large colonists centers: Comrat Taraclia. Authors categorically exclude using in this period, the term "Gagauzians" for determination of a separate ethnic group, preferring the terms- trans-Danubian immigrants and Bulgarians. Primarily it is because they are found in lists. Secondly, it is taken into account the coinhabitation of all ethnic groups in the region during that period, without denying at the same time, Bulgarian ethnicity’s prevalence. Hence, analysis of lists revealed that within this period, the most caracteristical family type for those settlers was the nuclear one (consisting of a spouse couple with or without children). There have been identified families who had servants, especially if the woman or man was widowed. The study has shown that in both presented colonies families with at least 5 and 12 children predominated. Finally, the authors conclude that the birth rate in the colonies was high. Rezumat În articolul dat sunt analizate „Listele imigranţilor de peste Dunăre, stabiliţi în Basarabia”. Acestea au fost alcătuite în 1818, ca urmare a activităţii comisiei rotmistrului Dimitrii Vatichioti, sub supravegherea tutorelui bulgarilor din Basarabia, generalul Ivan Nichitici Inzov. Scopul urmărit de comisie consta în stabilirea numărului exact al imigranţilor bulgari care s-au aşezat pe pământurile moşiereşti şi cele ale statului. Ulterior, în baza acestor documente ultimii, cu sprijinul lui I.N. Inzov, au obţinut anumite drepturi şi privilegii. În urma studierii acestei listei, cercetătorii drept exemplu prezintă două centre mari ale coloniştilor: Comrat şi Taraclia. Tot aici, autorii exclud categoric folosirea, în această perioadă, a termenului „găgăuzi”, ca etnie aparte, preferându-l pe cel de bulgari sau imigranţi transdanubieni, în primul rând din cauza că acestea se întâlnesc în liste. În al doilea rând, s-au luat în consideraţie toate etniile ce conlocuiau în regiune în acea perioadă, fără a nega, în acelaşi timp, predominaţia etniei bulgare. Aşadar, analiza listelor a demonstrat că în această perioadă, familia la colonişti era nucleară (compusă dintr-un cuplu cu sau fără copii). Tot aici sunt depistate familii care aveau şi servitori, mai ales dacă femeia sau bărbatul erau văduvi. Analiza a arătat că pentru cele două colonii era caracteristică familia cu cel puţin 5 şi cel mult 12 copii. În final, autorii ajung la concluzia că în colonii, rata natalităţii era mare.

Свиридов А.Н., Тлеугабулов Д.Т. Раннесакский комплекс могильника Бесоба в среднем течении реки Ишим // Сакская культура Сарыарки в контексте изучения этносоциокультурных процессов степной Евразии. - Алматы: "НИЦИА Бегазы-Тасмола", 2015 - С. 255-259.

Сакская культура Сарыарки в контексте изучения этносоциокультурных процессов Cтепной Евразии. Сборник научных статей, посвященный памяти археолога К. А. Акишева., 2015

This paper describes the funerary barrow No.8 of Besoba, a re-cently excavated Early Iron Age burial located in the middle valley of the Ishim river. According to the size of the mound, this barrow can be regarded as a royal burial of the Northern Saryarka region. The description of the funerary rite as well as the material culture collected, are here provided. Among the most interesting find-ings recovered from the partially destroyed and already plundered burial chamber it must be noticed hundreds of small gold beads, a socketed bullet-shaped arrowhead and some ceramic fragments of a spouted vessel. The funerary inventory and the topographical characteristics of the site allow to date this barrow to the 7th or 6th century BC.

Вайнберг Б.И. К истории кунгратских суфи; Туркменские поселения по Дарьялыку / Материалы Хорезмской экспедиции. Вып.4. М., 1960

Думиника Иван. Русская, молдавская и румынская историография к вопросу о переселении сербов на территорию Бессарабии в начале XIX в. // Молодежь и наука: Реальность и будущее. 2010 г. Т. III. История. Политология. Психология. Философия. Невинномысск, 2010. С. 56-58.